Member Login

Lost your password?

Registration is closed

Sorry, you are not allowed to register by yourself on this site!


Do you really know what’s happening around you?

March 22nd, 2012 by joe

The interesting thing about reality is that we don’t notice it until after it has happened, if we notice it at all. At a fundamental level we are experiencing the world as a flow of environmental data; things happen and register with our nervous system through our senses. And, we notice.

Or do we?

The interesting thing about reality is that we don’t notice it until after it has happened. Each sense is processing a constant stream of stimulus, whether we notice it or not. And, it’s all competing to be noticed by our consciousness. Most of it simply passes us by, as if it didn’t happen, but a small amount of it bubbles through our thoughts and awarenesses to cause us to direct our attention. By the time we do, the original event registered by our senses has gone, and been replaced by whatever is happening now.

The interesting thing about reality is that we sometimes don’t notice it at all. A sensation bubbles through our nervous system and we become conscious of it, and then we notice what it means; a sound becomes a plane passing overhead, and we no longer notice the sound just the plane; the sensation in our stomach becomes our hunger, and we only notice the hunger not the muscular tension. The colour, texture and sound in front of me becomes you, and I no longer notice the individual sense data that makes you up, I just notice something that I call you. I stop paying attention to what is going on, and instead pay attention to the abstraction of it, and in that moment I can cease to notice when you do something subtly different from what I expected you to do.

We mostly don’t notice what’s going on in the world, instead we notice what we notice about what’s going on, and then act as if that is what is going on. We replace reality with our model of reality, and reality as it is actually happening fades into the background. Once something has a meaning, that meaning replaces the something, and the raw something ceases to exist.

This has a profound impact on the way that we respond to each other in environments where feedback defines how we work and what are are doing.  Are we responding to what is actually happening, or what we think is happening? How does someone respond to our response, do they respond to what we are doing, or what they think that we are doing?

How often do you notice that the person talking to you was actually talking about something other than what you thought they were? If the answer is rarely, then I suggest you stop and actually pay attention to what’s really going on around you. Do you notice reality as it actually is, or could be that you’ve been paying attention to your imagination instead?

(Image: Idea go / FreeDigitalPhotos.net)

Can you write software by planning everything up front?

March 13th, 2012 by joe

Image: nuttakit / FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Traditionally software was designed as a large up-front planning task, using techniques such as the water fall model of software development. In these approaches the entire system was analysed and the software and hardware components architected up front, culminating in a complete design that just needed to be acted on by programmers to delivery the entire working system.

This is actually the way that most projects are planned in the non-software world, for example, when a building is constructed the plans are approved up front, the materials are calculated and plan for the construction is produced. Then it is just a matter of following the plan, with the right individuals for the job, with the right materials, in the right order, and the building gets built.

Of course, inevitably problems that occur in the delivery phase; something wasn’t thought through properly, some materials don’t perform as planned, the environment doesn’t behave as expected, the external dependencies don’t come in on time. This means that even when all the planning has been done in advance, even to a high quality, there is still a large uncertainty around delivery dates, and overall cost of the project. It is rare that a project can be delivered without some form of re-evaluation of the design axioms emerging from knowledge encountered during delivery.

Things get interesting when you begin to really take on board that however much you believe it can all be planned in advance, the reality is that you moment you make any changes to the system, new information emerges that wasn’t present when the original plan was made.

I challenge you to recall any circumstance in which you planned everything first, and then implemented the entire project without making any changes to that plan on the way. I bet you can’t!

Stop Stealing Dreams

March 7th, 2012 by joe

Seth Godin is a leading voice in area of marketing. He write a daily blog with has a huge following, and has written several books. His main viewpoint is that the social contract that brought the mass market into existence had a key component around the construction of schools and education for all. The factory owners not only needed a market for the product that the industrial revolution made possible, but they needed a supply of workers educated sufficiently to enable them to be good factory operators.

The world we live in today is no longer that world. The manufacturing sector has disappeared and we no longer need to educate our kids with the knowledge that they will need for a factory job. In fact, the social contract said give us your kids and we will train them and guarantee them a job. They will then have income and also become our customers. And, you will gain by having product available and an improved standard of living.

The world in which those rules were made, and the world we live in today have diverged, but the structure of education hasn’t. It still compulsory and we are teaching our kids and preparing them for a world that no longer exists. We are lying to them.

Seth has just finished writing a manifesto on education: Stop Stealing Dreams. Please take a few minutes and take a look, and share your comments with me. What are we going to do about it?

Defining your own job.

February 24th, 2012 by joe
Image: Master isolated images / FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Image: Master isolated images / FreeDigitalPhotos.net

When most people look for work they pick from the menu of jobs that are already on offer and enter a “career” based around already established roles.

Another way is to write the menu for yourself, and develop a meal that’s never been tasted before. It’s a harder job, because you’ve only got your intuitions guiding you, and the relationships you have in place with others supporting those directions that you want to move it.

However, I reckon that ultimately it’s more rewarding, as you get to define your own role and identity, instead of living your life through roles defined by others. At the end of the day you get to say “I lived my own life”.

Beginning to think about feedback in agile software development

February 23rd, 2012 by joe
Image: Stuart Miles / FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Image: Stuart Miles / FreeDigitalPhotos.net

I thought that as an exercise it would be interesting to explore in a series of small blog entries the nature of feedback in dynamical systems, and the implications that that has for an agile delivery methodology. So, stay tuned if you’re interested, as that’s what I’ll attempt to do over the next few days and weeks. Feel free to chime in, so I’m not just talking to myself :).

Thoughts about the nature of learning and education.

February 22nd, 2012 by joe
Image: FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Image: FreeDigitalPhotos.net

When someone learns what has to be present for them? Is it a teacher? Is it content? Is it a subject?

How do they know that they are learning? How do they know when they have learnt?

Is the learning in the form of knowledge or is it skills? Is it experience of doing something, or thinking something?

What is possible for them having acquired the learning?

Is it important how education is delivered? How does the way that it is delivered affect the quality of what is learnt? Is it possible to deliver education in such a way that prevents the acquisition of further education? Is it possible to deliver education in such a way that it enhances the future acquisition of further education?

What are the limitations present in the current way the education is delivered to our children? Which of these are are intentional and which are unintentional? Which are acknowledged and which are not noticed?

 

Seeing things again, as they really are.

January 9th, 2012 by joe

The moon has always been a flat disc, invariably waxing and waning through the illustrations in the story books of my youth. And, so as I grew up, that’s how I saw it – up in the sky, a mixture of bright light and silhouette, mysterious but unquestionably there.

I’m not sure when I became aware that the moon was a ball, in strange oscillation around our home planet. I think that that was from an early age too, when for me the solar system was first full of planets and lumps of rocks. But all I saw when I looked up as a child was the stars and a slice of the moon looking down on me in the night.

Suddenly, I remember when as a teenager it happened; the first time I looked at the moon and a voice in my head revealed in context, “that’s not a shape, that’s a volume!” And instantaneously, I became aware of the enormity of a massive orb encircling in the night sky. A thin slither of light highlighting a mostly dark, invisible globe, hiding in plain sight. The surprise of it still lives me with today, how something so old and familiar can suddenly become new and mysterious again.

Today as dusk threatens to break, I see my friend the moon again. This time it has a companion, a small bright star to keep it company; the only star in the sky. As a child I saw all points of light as stars, but this one is Jupiter; our humble moon and a majestic planet, owning the sky. Only now am I becoming aware that I have been looking at the planets all along, not all stars are stars, and what I thought was hidden was hidden in plain sight.

It is easy to get lost in the familiar and well known, the well heeled grooves of life. We take our relationship to the things in the world for granted, and over time they become comfortable and unchanging; we never think to question them or notice whether our ideas about them need updating. The same is true of our relationships with each other. Most individuals that we meet are pigeonholed into some category or other, after a very short time in their presence, and it is then subsequently very rare for a relationship to change dramatically, and for two individuals to get to know each other again as if for the first time.

I am reminded as I recall this childhood incident that it’s even possible for the most fundamental things, to become more than they were. That, quite literally, as sure that I am of what is real and what it means, I must hold open the possibility that at some level my working assumptions are wrong, and some deeper truth and understanding could be revealed to me.

As I find myself entering this new year, full of awareness that not so far beneath the surface of what I take for granted are relationships and inspirations staring me in the face but not previously seen, and I ponder on which of these will reveal themselves first.

On technology, time machines, and imagination

October 6th, 2011 by joe

A long long time ago, when the land was owned by dinosaurs and man had not started breathing yet, times were simpler. There were no mobile phones or computers, no lasers or global positioning satellites, no steam engines, cars, planes, clocks, radios, toaster waffles.

But here’s a profound thought: our understanding of physics tells us that the Laws are Nature immutable; they’ve been the same since the Universe began (or forever, if you believe that it’s always just been). That means that any of our magical and revolutionary devices that we’ve invented today with our clever modern know-how would have just as easily worked back in time, millions of years ago, aeons before they were conceived.

Imagine then that we have a time machine (probably a Tardis, so that it’s big enough on the inside to hold all our junk). We could load it up with radio towers, diesel and generators, and a load of mobile phones, and take them on a ride back in time. Set it all up and switch it on, and it would work! We’d be able to make phone calls, and sell monthly contracts to tyrannosaurs so that they could keep in touch with the Daily Fossil!

Why is this exciting, I guess you are asking? Hmm indeed.

Well, project yourself now to the future, the distant future, maybe over 10,000 years from now. It’s plausible to expect that we would have solved many mysteries. We’ll know what dark energy is, and dark matter too, and the Universe will be our slave. We’ll have discovered new phenomena, and developed new technologies and materials; our clothes will all have nano-scale detailing and we’ll all drive around in vehicles with the new Ubbba-Drive-4S, powered by our own sense of satisfaction.

So then, what if one of our future selves dives into their Tardis-4S, packed with goodies, and descends on our timeline? Arthur C. Clarke said that any sufficiently advanced technology would be indistinguishable from magic, and so it would seem when your future-ganger switches on their 4D-Quanta-Viddy and holograms of yourself from all the adjacent parallel realities appear instantaneously beside you. Magic indeed!

But the point is that their technological toys would work in the here and now, rather nicely too. (Just imagine how much you could flog them for on E-Bay!) That is to say, that the only reason that we don’t have such miraculous faculties available to us today is not because the Universe doesn’t support such nonsense, but because no one has thought of it yet! It’s a limitation of our imaginations, not a limit of nature.

It is possible for someone, right here right now, to invent some amazing technology so amazing that we would not recognise it in relation to the world that we already understand. And the only thing stopping us from conceiving of such things is our imagination, and the limitations that we hold in place that prevent us from seeing and understanding the possibilities that are potentialities in the system that are available to be harnessed.

So, how do you relate to the possibilities that are available to you right now? My point is that there are known possibilities and unknown possibilities (apologies to Rumsfeld). Unless you hold a space available in your imagination for the unknown ones you might never genuinely do anything that will surprise you, or astonish you, and the world will never benefit from that wonderful thing that only you could give birth to.

Don’t lose your right to vote…

October 2nd, 2011 by joe

20111002-121348.jpg

A few conversations….

September 30th, 2011 by joe

It’s not unusual for me to have extensive conversations with strangers. These days I’m spending a lot of time on trains, and have a lot of opportunity to partake of the company of many an interesting person.

In recent days, as well as the usual banter and jokes with the ticket staff, and random quips with fellow table sharers, I’ve managed to get myself embroiled in deep conversations about the design and influence of every day objects (with a marketing guru); the nature of the education in the school system, how it was constructed to prevent free thinking individuals and how the government is unable to redesign it in terms of its historical context (with a regional school coordinator); and the nature of consciousness, how it is affected by lack of sleep, and how everyday reality is shaped by random events and the attitude you have as you make your self present to it (mostly with myself.)